Richard S. Diamond Family Law Blog on Lawyers.com

A Parent's intentional interference with visitation may now give rise to a claim for money damages

Wednesday, February 11, 2009 by Richard S. Diamond

Currently on appeal are two cases making their way through the New Jersey court system; each taking very different positions on the issue.  In both cases, mothers have allegedly engaged in intentional behavior to cause the breakdown of the relationship between their children and their fathers, who are seeking monetary damages as a result.

In Segal vs Lynch, Judge Rand in Morris County, relying on the 1935 Heart Balm Act (N.J.S.A. 2A:23-1)  dismissed the claim, while in Smith vs Smith, Judge Gallipoli in Hudson County reached the opposite conclusion.  Judge Gallipoli’s opinion considered the legislative intent of the Heart Balm Act, concluding that its purpose is to prevent claims for loss of marital affection i.e. between spouses and not for harm to a relationship between father and child.  Therefore, he found that the Heart Balm Act was not applicable.   In reaching that conclusion, he found that the claim for emotional distress  (as a result of the loss of the relationship between the father and his children) is separate and distinct from the abolished claim for "alienation of affection" addressed in the Heart Balm Act.

Undoubtedly, this issue will make its way to the NJ Supreme Court and could open a new door long sought by fathers rights groups for years in their efforts to redress alienation type behavior by the other spouse.

This post was previously published on my New Jersey Divorce Law Blog. For a consultation on any New Jersey family law matter please contact me at 973 379 9292.  Further information on the law firm of Diamond & Diamond, P.A. can be found on our web-site.

Posted at 09:33 AM
Topic: Family Law
Lawyers.com Blog

Lawyers.comSM Blog

Get an inside view of
Lawyers.com

Blog Topics

Bloggers

Archives

Recent...