While other states are still debating whether to recognize gay marriages, at a hearing in Trenton
last week, New Jersey Superior Court Judge Mary Jacobson issued a divorce instead of a dissolution
of a civil union to a lesbian couple who had been married in Canada.
The Attorney
General’s office had argued that the couple should receive a dissolution of a civil union,
rather than a divorce. However, the Judge disagreed, advancing the view that a divorce was necessary
to allow one of the parties, La Kia Hammond to return to Canada and marry another woman there. Her
lawyer successfully argued that a dissolution of a civil union might not be accepted nor recognized
in Canada as ending the parties’ marriage.
"To grant the divorce here is not
against public policy," Jacobson said. "It's consistent with the strong marriage
recognition principles that have been practiced since the 1800s."
In making this
decision, the Judge overruled an Attorney General’s directive that gay marriages that occur
elsewhere should be treated as a civil union in New Jersey and not as a marriage for dissolution
purposes.
It will be interesting to see whether the Attorney General's office appeals this
decision or if the legislature will decide to recognize gay marriages performed elsewhere.
Several states are currently grappling with this issue. If recognition of gay marriages does occur
in New Jersey, then the barrier against gay marriage will be further lowered.
This post
was previously published on my New Jersey Divorce Law Blog. For a consultation on any New Jersey family law
matter please contact me at 973 379 9292. Further information on the law firm of Diamond &
Diamond, P.A. can be found on our web-site.