The gold standard of any custody dispute is what custody arrangements will best serve the interests of the child. A determination of what is best for any particular child requires a case-by-case examination of both the needs of the child and the advantages presented by those seeking custody.
Most custody disputes involve a mother and father at the time of or after a divorce. Others involve a third party, usually a relative, seeking custody at the time of the death or incapacity of a parent. Occasionally, a custody dispute arises when the parents have never been married. The courts start with a presumption that parents are in the best position to look out for the welfare of their own child. This presumption can be overcome by establishing that a parent is not fit or able to best care for the child. In making these determinations, the courts look to various factors, established by state statute or case law.
The list of factors involving parents include:
These factors are not exclusive. A court may also look at where each parent lives, the local school system, or a parent's other relationships. While being unfit to have custody is an automatic disqualifier, the remaining factors are not given the same weight in each case. A parent seeking custody cannot just look at all the factors put a check mark in each column where it weighs more in favor of one than the other, then total up the scores. Judges give different weight to each factor in each case.
Some states have lists of statutory or case law factors that must be considered by a judge in making a decision. Before determining custody, the judge will look at some or all of the following non-exclusive factors by focusing on the child, rather than the parent:
Here also, no one factor provides a final resolution. It should be noted that factors that do not affect the relationship between the child and the person seeking custody are not to be considered.
While some states require a judge to address each statutory factor in making a decision, others permit a judge to just state that he has considered all the factors. In almost all cases, the judge will explain which factors weighed the heaviest and the basis for the decision as to who will have custody.
To assure that a custody dispute does not become a custody battle, it is best if the parties can reach an amicable agreement, by employing an objective review of the same factors.
a contract that a court infers to exist from the words and conduct of the parties
More Legal News