Many states consider the incomes of both parents, and the time the children spend with each parent. In such states, the parent earning the larger income will likely owe the other parent a support amount, adjusted because of the time spent with that parent.
Other states don't consider the amount of time that the children spend with each parent. In such states, the parent earning the larger income will likely owe a normal support amount.
A Michigan statute that allowed fathers to settle paternity suits by agreeing to a fixed amount of support was recently held unconstitutional. The court reasoned that child support is a right belonging to the child, not the parents, and is always modifiable.
If the lump sum is supposed to waive her right to seek support, it won't be enforced, as that right belongs to the child. Additionally, if she receives government assistance, the government will come after you for reimbursement. If a woman is claiming you've fathered a child by her, it is best to consult with an attorney.
The exemption doesn't have to follow custody. Rules regarding the federal tax dependency exemption vary from state to state. In Ohio, for example, a court is required to review all pertinent income information to determine the overall impact of the dependency exemption. If one parent's income is high enough to trigger a phase-out of exemptions, it wouldn't make sense to award the exemption to that parent.
In Ohio, at least one appeals court has ruled that if there are no net tax savings to be gained for awarding a noncustodial parent the exemption in alternating years, the trial court must award the exemption to the custodial parent.
Other states don't allow the transfer of the dependency exemption under any circumstances. For example, the Supreme Court of Georgia has ruled that the transfer of the exemption would defeat the federal tax statute's objective of certainty in granting the exemption, and that allowing courts to arbitrarily transfer the exemption would burden the courts with having to make case-by-case determinations as to the exemptions.
If you decide to pay the mother directly, make sure you pay by check and keep the checks as evidence that you have paid.
Even when a court doesn't require a parent to pay college expenses absent an agreement between the parents, such expenses may be taken into account by the court when considering whether or not to award alimony.
Q: How is support determined if both parents have the children for an equal amount of time?
Return to index . . .
Q: A woman is claiming I'm the father of her child. She says she won't seek support if I pay her a lump sum. Will this work?
Return to index . . .
Q: I was awarded custody of the kids. Shouldn't I have received the IRS exemption?
Return to index . . .
Q: I'd like to keep the support obligation out of the courts by just paying the mother directly. Can I do this?
Return to index . . .
Q: Can the court require me to pay my son's college tuition and expenses in addition to support, insurance and medical bills?
Return to index . . .
Q: My husband works for a good friend of his. I know he's had his income reduced so his eventual child support payments won't be so high. Will it matter that his income has gone down?
Return to index . . .
Q: My wife and I both have very large incomes and the support amount determined using our state's percentage system would be ridiculous. What will happen?
Return to index . . .
Q: I just had a baby and I'm not married. My boyfriend isn't being very helpful. What legal options do I have?
Return to index . . .
Q: My son's father filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy and listed my childbirth expenses as a debt. Can these be discharged in bankruptcy?
Return to index . . .
Q: I'm 17 and have an eight-month-old child. The father of my child is also 17, has a job, and will be working full time over the summer. Can I get child support from him?
Return to index . . .
Q: Am I obligated, through the court, to continue to pay support for my disabled daughter after she turns 18?
failure to exercise the great degree of care typical of an extraordinarily prudent person
More Legal News